Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Politics’ Category

Rob Ford protest

Rob Ford Protest 2

One thousand people, give or take a couple hundred, congregated at Nathan Phillips Square yesterday to protest mayor Rob Ford and the crack allegations currently dogging his so-called leadership.

Ford continues to lie to Torontonians about his substance abuse, and the existence of a video that depicts his crack use. In the video he makes homophobic and racist comments.

It is widely believed that he has purchased the damaging evidence and had it destroyed, but the plot continues to thicken, with six members of his staff resigning in less than a week and murder charges laid against those who killed the man photographed with Rob Ford the night the video was said to have been filmed.

Oh my. We’re all hoping that he’ll be removed from power soon. He has clearly lost the confidence of his staff and his chronic lying demonstrates a sociopathic streak that’s becoming increasingly disturbing to the electorate.

Rob Ford Protest 3

Rob Ford Protest 4

Rob Ford Protest 5

Rob Ford Protest 6

Rob Ford Protest 7

Rob Ford Protest 8

Rob Ford Protest

Rob and Doug Ford are wannabe dictators

Mayor Rob Ford, left, the day after news broke that there was a video of him smoking crack cocaine

Mayor Rob Ford, left, the day after news broke that there exists a video of him smoking crack cocaine

Now that both Toronto city mayor Rob Ford and his brother, city councillor Doug Ford, are married to controversy, they’ve devised an offensive attack plan: Blame the elite liberal media. Sarah Palin taught them well.

For those of you unfamiliar of what I’m talking about, allow me to provide a summary. Bear with me.

Two weeks ago Gawker, the New York based gossip website, reported that a tape exists of Toronto mayor Rob Ford smoking crack cocaine, that was allegedly filmed within the last 6 months. Shortly after the story broke Robyn Doolittle and Kevin Donovan, two reputable award-winning journalists from The Toronto Star, the largest circulated daily in Canada, wrote an article revealing that they saw the video as well. Three times in fact. They took separate notes and then corroborated those notes with each other. In the video Rob Ford is said to make racist and homophobic comments.

After the story ran, Rob Ford kept a low profile, saying nothing, and firing his Chief of Staff who recommended that he step back and get some help for his reported substance abuse problem. Eight days later he held a “press conference”, where he denied that he smoked crack and was an addict. His main message was that The Star was out to get him. In fact his message has not changed at all since then. He then left the podium for his brother to answer reporters’ questions. Bizarre already, right? I mean, why not clear the air and answer questions himself?

The people who own the video also provided The Star reporters with a photograph of Rob Ford posing with drug dealers, one of whom was murdered two months ago.

Rob Ford and Anthony Smith

It would take a lot to convince any rational logical human being that Robyn Doolittle and Kevin Donovan would risk their careers for the sole purpose of taking down the mayor. Let me remind you that it was Gawker who initially broke the story, and to believe that Doolittle and Donovan are fabricating their account is absurd.

Many people have questioned why The Star didn’t purchase the video, and the answer is based on ethics, the media cannot give money to drug dealers.

However, Gawker has established a Rob Ford Crackstarter campaign in the hopes of raising $200,000 to purchase the video. There is a snag, the owner of the video has gone underground, and neither Gawker nor The Star have heard from him since last Sunday. Gawker is $8,000 towards reaching their goal, and if they can’t make the transaction with the owner, they have promised to donate the money to a Canadian addiction and/or mental health charity.

Later today it was reported that the police have spoken to a senior member of Ford’s team after they received a tip linking a recent killing to the alleged video. So the plot is thickening.

If this wasn’t enough, on Saturday, Canada’s newspaper of record, The Globe and Mail published a well researched story about the Ford family’s history of drug dealing.

Doug Ford was particularly singled out by ten anonymous sources as a well-known hashish dealer in the 1980s. Doug oafishly defended himself on national television by blaming The Globe, and of course, the elite liberal social media. So what we have here are two brothers incapable of taking responsibility for their actions.

The reason the latter story has any relevance is because during the 2010 municipal elections the Ford brothers ran on an anti-drug platform and were critical of mayoral candidate George Smitherman’s admission that he had a past drug problem. Unlike the Ford brothers, Smitherman was open and honest about his past drug use, and his recovery. But that didn’t stop the Fords from underhandedly lambasting him about it any chance they could get.

For those outside of Toronto it would be beneficial to know that Rob Ford has been an ineffective mayor and his tenure has been marred in a myriad of controversies since he was elected.

Whether it’s lying about a DUI and marijuana possession charge in Florida, or getting thrown out of a Maple Leafs hockey game for getting into drunken, expletive-laden arguments with fans (and also calling them “communists” and asking one man if he would like his wife to get raped), or giving a six-year-old girl the middle finger, or driving while reading, or repeated domestic disturbances at his house, or being asked to leave work functions because he is clearly inebriated, Rob Ford’s response to any and all of these allegations is always the same: LIE, BLAME, and when confronted with evidence, half-heartedly apologize and pretend none of it ever happened.

He is holding the city of Toronto hostage with his refusal to resign from his position. His ideas read like a parody from an episode of The Simpsons. His plans for the Waterfront included a ferris wheel, casino and monorail, all of which were predictably defeated in council.

Rob and his brother behave like wannabe dictators. Unable to take criticism, they make enemies of anyone who challenges them, bullying, intimidating and resorting to childish antics in a vain attempt to get their way. If this was any other country, I am certain they would kill their detractors, and silence the freedom of the press.

They are not good people. They speak in soundbites and slogans, and when questioned, or backed into a corner, lie their way out of it. They hold no punches, are mean-spirited and lack any skills to engage in rational discourse.

The mayor refuses to take questions from the media, even going as far as to keep vital information from The Star, and ensuring that his most despised newspaper isn’t invited to mayoral events. They host a weekly radio show that is rife with propaganda. If this were 1940s Germany, the brothers would be in their element.

They were elected on a platform that stressed government transparency, but the mayor won’t even release his weekly schedule, something that each mayor before him did willingly. Instead, journalists must obtain Ford’s schedule through the Freedom of Information Act.

I could go on and on. It is clear that the Fords are not running a dictatorship, and this is why they are antiquated and ineffective.

This is what happens when a mayor, as short-sighted as Rob Ford listens only to the advice and recommendations of his thug brother.

Eventually the video of Rob Ford smoking crack will leak, and I’m curious to see if he will take accountability for his horrible behaviour.

Will he apologize for insinuating that the media, who exists to keep politicians accountable for their actions, are liars? Will he do the honourable thing and admit that he was wrong to have lied, to have besmirched the integrity of the work of seasoned journalists? Will he apologize to Torontonians for degrading the mayorship and Toronto’s international reputation?

Yesterday during their radio show the brothers called journalists “maggots” and “scum”. They then ranted about all their magical accomplishments since taking office, citing unsourced statistics and dollar figures that they believe they have saved the city. It had to be heard to be believed, but one thing was certain from the madness: No one should behave in such a callous, knee-jerk reactive obtuse fashion, including politicians.

One thing that also irks me about the Fords is their supporters assertion that they are blue-collar workers. They are not. As a first generation Canadian I am proud of my working-class father’s ability to make a life for himself and his family from absolutely nothing. Rob and his brother were born into wealth, and are millionaires. These are not self-made men, and to say that they are is both a lie, and an insult to those who are.

No, in fact these two men are cowards. In the last five minutes it was reported that two members of the mayor’s team have just resigned from their positions.

Ego is a terrible thing. It hinders a human being from altruistic behaviour, which is what we should expect from any individual seeking a position in public service.

But this has gone too far. The mayor and his brother have set a very low bar for anyone who succeeds them. However, whoever that person may be, they will certainly be an improvement.

Toronto needs to heal. We need leaders that are committed to truth, honesty, dignity and integrity. The Ford brothers are committed to their own egos, but are so blithely unaware that the world is laughing at their buffoonery.

Maybe that’s the most tragic part about this entire debacle. The revelation that these two men are stuck with the lives that they have created for themselves, and as a result of their poor judgments, so are their children. Their wives. Their friends.

Maybe that’s why Rob Ford has a substance abuse problem. It takes a lot of self-loathing to loathe the people who try to highlight your plight in an effort to get you help.

Don’t drag the whole city of Toronto down with you Rob. Grow up. Get help. Be an adult.

According to a lot of straight men, I’m a faggot

Yesterday afternoon I was walking down Church St. when a group of men driving a truck started laughing at me. I was wearing a pair of green shorts with a tank top, because the weather was hot and that’s what gay guys do.

I knew their look well. It’s what a lot of straight guys do when they’re confronted by gays. It’s that look where they try to convey how silly and repugnant gay people are, and they often throw in a little laugh and sometimes shake their head to signify just how repulsed they are at the freak show before them.

Walking in front of me was an older gay couple holding hands, this is a common occurrence in gay-friendly Toronto. The men in the truck pointed and laughed, while I stared back at them. I wasn’t going to feel intimidated because we don’t adhere to their narrow-minded conventions, so I locked their eyes, but I’m sure as they sped away they muttered about how I was trying to seduce them.

It probably left them secure in the fact that we, meaning gay people, exist to entertain them. We’re so laughable, such a joke in the minds of these men that we can’t possibly be taken seriously as living, breathing human beings. We must know our place as silly nellies.

In retrospect I appreciated their restraint. In the past straight men have actually thrown objects from their moving vehicles at me; once it was a book (how did they know I like to read?), and more than once I’ve had to endure public humiliation by being called a “FAAAAAGGGGOOOOOOTTTTTT” by a group of cowardly men, driving their parents’ car.

So okay, I prefer being laughed at then yelled at. Seriously though, why do guys do this? What’s their problem, and why are they so afraid all of the time? Secure people don’t have to go around trying to make people feel inferior.

On Saturday I was reading a fellow bloggers recent post about an anti-homophobic demonstration in Georgia (the country) that was hijacked by anti-gay clergy who beat and attempted to kill many of the gay-rights supporters. I would link to her post but it appears she has removed it.

Again I beg the question, what are these straight individuals so afraid of? Their fear is so massive that they will kill because of it. They will commit the greatest atrocities to tell gay people that they are worthless, valueless and sick. Their hatred means so much to them that they will violate gay people’s physical autonomy. All of this is perfectly logical in their minds, and worse, they have the support of many people.

I grew up Catholic, and while attending Catholic school I was told several times by teachers that gay people were biological defects, deserved of pity, but not tolerance. The individuals who felt so comfortable expressing these beliefs always cited the book of Leviticus as evidence or justification of their archaic and barbaric reasoning.

Of course, anyone who opened the book of Leviticus and read it for themselves would learn pretty quickly that it lists a whole load of activities humans should not engage in. Among them are not eating shellfish, or wearing two types of fabrics, or shaving their beards. All these “crimes” are considered abominations and punishable by death. Oh yeah, and you’re not supposed to have sex with a woman during her period. But it’s okay to rape her if she’s not putting out when you want her to. After all she’s supposed to submit to the wants and needs of men at all times.

I mean, we all understand that these rules are fallible, and antiquated and well, stupid. But the gay thing stays with us, primarily because people are fixated on what two men do together during sex. I mean, I think that’s the reason. I don’t know about you, but I don’t spend a lot of time thinking about heterosexual sex, and to be honest the very idea gives me the heebie-jeebies, but I live with it!

Perhaps what gets straight men so worked up is that there is a passive recipient in gay sex. Maybe they’re bothered by effeminate gay men because, as well all know, being feminine is considered weak, and why would anyone want to be weak? It does make me laugh to think about how much more pain women endure during their lifetime compared to men, and how high their pain threshold is while men succumb so easily to the common cold.

Considering how corrupted men are, especially when it comes to the whole sex thing, the way that they create boys’ clubs, and actively exclude anyone who is different, how they’re prone to violence, I would argue that it’s straight men who are actually the weakest of all groups.

Straight men. Dear God. Sometimes I can’t believe that I have to exist on the same earth as so many of them. Ladies, don’t let them beguile you with their mediocrity. Trust me when you and your gay bestie are off, they’re talking about how fuckable some lady friend is, and how gross gay men are. Lesbians are okay, because they exist to titillate their sexual fantasies. Let’s not forget that a lesbian’s only purpose, is to give a straight man a boner. They don’t have time for the feminist lesbians though. They’re CRAZY! All this talk about equality, and they don’t even shave their legs. Gross.

There’s this thing that straight men do, that bothers me above all else. Even more than the hating gay people thing and yelling obscenities from their moving cars. The one thing that irks me the most is that they always think they’re an authority on everything. They know it all, even when they’re grossly misinformed.

If there is one topic that I know more than most people, it’s tennis. And every now and again, I like to test a straight men’s inferiority complex by talking about the latest tennis news and what not. Sure enough, each time the straight man, in all his manly knowledge, pretends to know something about the topic, even though I spend most of my time correcting him. But I’m wasting my breath, he’s a MAN, sports is his domain, and I’m a lowly gay. Barf.

To be fair, straight women can be just as bad. I don’t know how many times I’ve been asked, “Who’s the man and who’s the woman in the relationship?” Or the proclamation, “I don’t believe in gay marriage.” Who cares what you believe? Because you’re a bigot, and don’t believe in equality, it means that every gay person must accept legal limitations on their freedom to make you comfortable?

Once I was walking by Massey Hall in Toronto when a group of straight girls drove up to me, and asked “Are you gay?” to which I answered, “Yes.” They crumbled into fits of laughter, saying “He admits he’s a faggot!”

I’m not even going to mention the time that I was chased by a group of women after a Tori Amos concert who proceeded to hurl insults about how ‘girly’ I appeared, and of course, the f-bomb was dropped often. Although I just did didn’t I?

Oh well, I guess this is my adversity, and one that I’ve been able to overcome so far. It would be nice if straight people weren’t such entitled asses though.

I’ll leave with a quote from Nina Simone: “You don’t have to live next to me, just give me my equality!”

Men find it challenging to respect women

The recent suicide of a young girl in Canada has me thinking a lot about sex. The girl was raped by four young boys who then, without shame or remorse, further victimized her by sharing a photo of the incident online that went viral. The girl lost all of her friends, and was blamed for her rape. She was labeled a slut, an old trick that is devised to disgrace the victim into silence.

This is not new. Men believe that women exist for their entertainment, and more importantly, for their sexual gratification. But we’re allowing them to behave this way.

Young girls are voluntarily submitting themselves to “gang bangs”. I was recently speaking to a paramedic who informed me that sex parties among teenagers is common. The paramedic has answered many emergency calls to find a young girl naked, boys laughing at her, because she had been injured during an attempt at “double penetration.”

Boys are getting their sexual education from pornography, where women are objectified. One of the most popular pornographic sites is Brazzers.com. They produce a series called “Punish the bitch” where in each episode a woman is essentially raped by men. Make no mistake that this is fantasy, but how telling that dominance over women is considered titillating to men. Rape is about violence and not about sex.

When I was growing up I was often teased for being too feminine. I learned quickly that women were rarely respected. I mean, you just have to turn on the television set to see how women are viewed in our society. Female characters usually only exist to support the male story arc, and female driven vehicles are rarely successful in the ratings. Plus it’s very important for women to be sexy, and hot. It’s a common sitcom formula to have a young, beautiful wife, married to an overweight insensitive sloth of a man.

I never understood why my peers felt that femininity was synonymous with weakness, but they did. And little has changed. Implicit in all of this are women, who should share some of the blame. At 33 you would be surprised how many women my age confess that they hope their first-born child will be a boy. When I ask them to explain what they mean, they usually respond by expressing the negative characteristics of young girls. This consistently shocks me.

Parents raise their little girls to seek the approval of their father, to be submissive, not to ask too many questions and to obsess over their appearance. It’s vitally important that they wear pink, take an interest in makeup and compete for the attention of boys.

This puts boys in the driver seat, where they’re most comfortable. They’re praised for being aggressive and dominant, and if they demonstrate empathy it’s considered feminine. Weak.

I can definitely vouch for this as I was raised in a family of four boys. The fact that I was gay saved me from the traps many men succumb to.

This does not mean that gay men aren’t equally guilty of objectifying the human body. It’s always disheartening that when I strike up a nice conversation with another gay man, how quickly it turns into a sexual invitation. The gay community is morbidly concerned with physical appearances.

The most popular posts on my blog are the ones involving images of naked men or illusions to sex. Here, here and here. As you can see, I’m just as guilty.

In our packaged, homogeneous society, it is not warranted to see the divinity in other people. We lack the ability to control our impulses, and are praised for behaving badly.

Men view sex as a conquest, and it’s such an insidious and pervasive cultural standard, that we can’t recognize it. Everyone wants to blame one thing, like social media or parenting.

Personally I believe that PEOPLE are to blame. That means you and me. We’re the ones who are refusing to evolve and see the world — and other people — in a more positive light that does not revolve around our personal pleasure.

North Americans are dangerously obsessed with sex, and our children are raised to fit into boxes. Some people enjoy these tiny niches, but in the end, we’re not forming well-rounded individuals.

I’ve heard a lot of people talk about the lack of empathy in boys, and men. How do we solve this problem? For one we teach our children to respect women as individuals with hearts, minds and brains. We stop obsessing over how we look, and how we’re supposed to look. We love ourselves for who we are, and don’t strive to be a person that someone else wants us to be.

We allow girls to be more than bodies and faces. We encourage them to use their brains and their minds, and we value their ability to think and to be educated.

Rape is an awful offence. What kind of man uses his penis as a weapon? Sadly, even with this men get a pass. We continue to blame the girl, or woman, because of how she was dressed. If you’re going to dress like a slut then you should expect being forced against your will to have sex. I mean, doesn’t that sound like the most ridiculous logic?

I would question why women feel it necessary to dress provocatively at all. Perhaps because it’s the only way they can have value in a society that sexualizes them at infancy.

I wish I could urge everyone to value actions over being sexy. But when a major headline in the newspaper is that Hillary Clinton showed up to a meeting wearing glasses and no makeup, I think it’s obvious where our priorities lie.

The evolution of mom dancing

Michelle Obama is so awesome.

Rob Ford’s guide to success… and failure

Photo courtesy of BlogTO

Today Toronto’s disappointing mayor was removed from office over a conflict of interest. Good riddance. In the past two years since his election Rob Ford has courted mostly controversy, and limited success. He is the first and only mayor in Toronto’s history to be evicted from office, and I’m happy to see the end of his buffoonery and public embarrassments. He ran a campaign of “transparency” but when elected refused to answer reporters’ questions or make his weekly schedule available to the public, something every mayor before him had no problem with doing. What was he hiding? The fact that he wasn’t doing his job because he was too busy coaching high school football.

You might wonder how someone with his lack of skills was able to assume the highest office in Canada’s largest city. Well folks it’s not that hard, and in fact, from my experience working in the public sector, people like him are often rewarded for their underhanded and deceitful practises. With no self-awareness and the mind of a child, the sky is the limit.

So in honour of the best day ever, I have developed Rob Ford’s guide to success… and failure. Obvs.

1. Be born into a wealthy family.
2. Have below average intelligence.
3. Assume that because you are rich you are free to do whatever it is you please.
4. Don’t read.
5. Have only one interest. In Rob Ford’s case, football.
6. Lie when caught doing something wrong. When irrefutable evidence is presented that you are in fact lying, provide a back-handed apology.
7. Have your brother do your job for you. He’s smarter anyway.
8. When backed into a corner, or having a discussion with someone who disagrees with you, play dirty. Real dirty. Have no shame in assassinating their character by any means necessary.
9. If anyone challenges you, have them fired.
10. Believe you’re a dictator, stop talking to media reporters and convince some mediocre radio station to give you a show where you can spew your propaganda.
11. Never complete a full sentence.
12. When asked questions that you find difficult, blame the person asking and call him/her an “elitist.”
13. Continue to run on a platform that you’re going to clean up City Hall. Citizens love to hear that you’re going to take on the corrupted. This way you distract the public from the realities of your own corruption.
14. Take no accountability or responsibility for your actions.
15. Ensure that your only friends are high school football players and skip all your meetings to hang out with them. They’re so cool!
16. Publicly make disparaging comments about ethnic, gay, physically active and disabled people. Don’t support any of the causes that they find important.
17. Shun inclusiveness. Maintain a clear message that everyone should be just like you.
18. Run a reelection campaign with 2.5 years left in your first term. It’s not going well anyway, and your colleagues refuse to listen to you.
19. Under no circumstances listen to your peers and build consensus with your colleagues. It makes you look weak.
20. Get fired when all the above tactics become tiresome.

Good-bye Robby, don’t let the door hit you on the way out. Oh yeah, and thanks for this doofus:

What if money didn’t matter?

I’ve been nursing a sore throat for a few days now and spent the majority of my waking hours taking care of Maude and watching documentaries like the Inside Job, Maxed Out and Just Another Missing Kid, all of which I recommend that you enjoy when you find the time. In addition I watched Food Inc. for the five thousandth time and raged!

I also watched the wonderful YouTube clip above and it got me thinking, as most things happen to do.

Clearly we have to work to earn a living and to enjoy our lives. But let’s face the facts. Money has no value, and it never did. For decades we believed that having lots of it determined our character and made us better than people who didn’t have it. “They must be lazy,” we would think.

Well now we know that isn’t true. The majority of people are working more hours, making less money while losing their pensions and their benefits. The middle class has been completely eradicated and the rich, as cliché as it sounds, continues to get richer while we continue to get poorer. Gas prices continue to increase and no one can really explain to us why. The people making these decisions are lying to our faces and we’re buying every word of it.

There is no fairness in money. There never really was any.

My peers are living pay cheque to pay cheque despite having followed the rules that were laid out to them from infancy that promised them success. Those who are my age who do have money inherited it from deceased grandparents. They did not make it on their own.

Company executives continue to mishandle their finances resulting in the termination of not their jobs (even though they’re ultimately responsible for the failure of their company because they make all the decisions), but innocent workers who are merely doing their job to the best of their ability at $50,000 a year, or less. It’s shocking.

I’ve met many executives in my day who believe that they rose to their positions because they are intelligent and have earned it. I beg to differ. I’ve rarely met a vice-president who wowed me with his or her brilliance; their success is often achieved from nepotism and cronyism.  What they do have is a lack of empathy, compassion and a maniacal obsession to increase their monetary gains. They are psychotically obsessed with image and social position.

Intelligence is not determined by these qualities, but by the ability to communicate with people in an authentic and genuine manner. It’s sobering that few people have people skills, especially those at the top.

Through all this I can’t help but notice that it’s the consumers, people like us, who are to blame. Really when you think about it we have the power to revolt, to demand change. The writing is on the wall, capitalism is over, and while it lags on its hind legs fighting its  eventual demise, we turn the other cheek apathetically. We take our antidepressants, drink our alcohol, see our shrink and take an interest in the shenanigans of Kim Kardashian because we feel helpless.

The documentaries that I listed above were all viewed on Netflix, which at $8 a month is a real bargain. Netflix encountered negative press a while back because after significant subscriber and profit growth it got greedy and increased its prices overnight. What resulted was consumer backlash in the form of cancelled subscriptions. Executives at Netflix witnessed their stock prices fall sharply and immediately reversed their decision and apologized.

That’s how simple it was. People like me and you told these assholes that we were on to them, that we knew what they were trying to do and that it was unfair.

Imagine what would happen if we took this one, two, three steps further and demanded from our governments to protect the poor by ensuring that they had access to education, health care and jobs! Imagine. Just imagine. Imagine if our governments put their citizens first, and not corporations.

What it feels like for a man

I was having a conversation with a friend this past weekend and she mentioned a colleague of hers who expressed disdain for anything feminine. The shocking part is that her colleague is a woman.

This got me thinking about the female chauvinist pig. Women who adopt conventional, even stereotypical male views about women. Apparently my friend’s co-worker had a crush on a male friend of hers, and in her mission to learn more about him, discovered that he had effeminate qualities. No, he is not gay, just perfectly comfortable with embracing all sides of his personality. She conveyed disgust in observing this about him, and made disparaging remarks about his womanly qualities, comparing them to weakness.

It’s nothing that I haven’t heard about before, and much like Cornflake Girl, women are often the worst to one another, all too willing to stab each other in the back with a stiletto heel, especially if it means obtaining the attention of a male suitor. In my personal opinion, it’s always best to be the raisin.

This idea that femininity is weak bothers me for many reasons. First, men get a lot of free passes and are often rewarded if they can articulately identify an emotion or a feeling. The pervasive idea is that the feminine is weak, and it is used to degrade and oppress women the world over. However, the philosophy behind this belief is rancid, and weaker than the personal qualities it attacks.

In countries operating under biblical law, women are forced to cover their entire bodies, over fear that they may entice a man sexually. How this makes sense to anyone is appalling to me. First of all, shouldn’t it be expected of men to control their primal desires, and rather than forcing women to hide behind veils, they should resist the urge to rape? Why are we obligating women to be ashamed of their sexuality, when men can’t control their erections? Isn’t the latter what we should be addressing? Isn’t that the real problem?

Pornography bothers me for many reasons, but none greater than the simplistic depiction of sex as a power play between men and women. Good sex is not confined to dominant and submissive roles, but it’s widely accepted by our global society that a woman’s role is to serve the needs of men.

Look at how male and female athletes are depicted on the cover of magazines. Male athletes are often dressed in suits, lauded for their masculine characteristics. Female athletes are more scantily dressed and only achieve respect from men if they are attractive, sexy and desirable. Their talent, and the substance of their character are afterthoughts.

Many moons ago an acquaintance of mine was gushing about her new boyfriend. “He reads,” she confessed. “He’s the first boyfriend I’ve had who enjoys reading books.” I asked her to name a few of the authors that he likes, and when she did I wasn’t surprised to learn that they were all men. I told her that I read a lot too, but my interests are varied, and consist of male, female, gay, straight, black and white authors.

I was disappointed with her response because she should expect her boyfriend to be interested in female writers, actors, intellectuals, academics, etc. We should be raising our boys to believe that what a woman thinks is equally valid as that of a man. We shouldn’t make young men feel ashamed to admit that they enjoy learning about the world through a female perspective.

These roles that are presented to us are insulting, because they limit both sexes into black and white, restrictive archetypes that we then consider standards that everyone should strive for. It does nothing to further understanding of one another.

Perhaps what we should accept is that sexuality (and I’m not talking about gay or straight, but about our innate nature of feminine and masculine characteristics) exists on a spectrum, and if we’re open and fearless enough, we might learn to love ourselves for what we are, without conforming to boxes created for us to make the rest of the world comfortable.

I feel bad for my friend’s colleague. She is limiting herself in ways she can’t imagine by judging her crush for being comfortable with who he is, and uninterested with how other people expect him to behave. Perhaps if she ever does find a boyfriend, he’ll most likely be as closed-minded as she is, and how unfortunate is it that she’ll never embrace how wonderfully diverse the human species is.

Remembering Jack Layton one year later

I work in a high-rise building located behind Toronto’s City Hall. While I was walking to work yesterday morning I noticed media trucks reporting from Nathan Phillips Square. Not an unusual sight. Then I remembered that it was the year anniversary of Jack Layton’s death. Throughout the day Torontonians arrived en masse to leave messages for Jack in chalk, as they did last year when we learned of his passing from cancer at the age of 61.

Because I didn’t want to be witness to a media circus (I’m not one for crowds either), I waited until this morning to take photographs of the heart-felt sentiments left by everyday people. It was sobering to read what people had written.

Jack Layton was one of a kind. He will be missed for generations.

Free Pussy Riot, free them now!


Yekaterina Samutsevich’s closing statement in the criminal case against the feminist punk group Pussy Riot:

During the closing statement, the defendant is expected to repent or express regret for her deeds, or to enumerate attenuating circumstances. In my case, as in the case of my colleagues in the group, this is completely unnecessary. Instead, I want to express my views about the causes of what has happened with us.

The fact that Christ the Savior Cathedral had become a significant symbol in the political strategy of our powers that be was already clear to many thinking people when Vladimir Putin’s former [KGB] colleague Kirill Gundyaev took over as head of the Russian Orthodox Church. After this happened, Christ the Savior Cathedral began to be used openly as a flashy setting for the politics of the security services, which are the main source of power [in Russia].

Why did Putin feel the need to exploit the Orthodox religion and its aesthetics? After all, he could have employed his own, far more secular tools of power—for example, national corporations, or his menacing police system, or his own obedient judiciary system. It may be that the tough, failed policies of Putin’s government, the incident with the submarine Kursk, the bombings of civilians in broad daylight, and other unpleasant moments in his political career forced him to ponder the fact that it was high time to resign; otherwise, the citizens of Russia would help him do this. Apparently, it was then that he felt the need for more convincing, transcendental guarantees of his long tenure at the helm. It was here that the need arose to make use of the aesthetics of the Orthodox religion, historically associated with the heyday of Imperial Russia, where power came not from earthly manifestations such as democratic elections and civil society, but from God Himself.

How did he succeed in doing this? After all, we still have a secular state, and shouldn’t any intersection of the religious and political spheres be dealt with severely by our vigilant and critically minded society? Here, apparently, the authorities took advantage of a certain deficit of Orthodox aesthetics in Soviet times, when the Orthodox religion had the aura of a lost history, of something crushed and damaged by the Soviet totalitarian regime, and was thus an opposition culture. The authorities decided to appropriate this historical effect of loss and present their new political project to restore Russia’s lost spiritual values, a project which has little to do with a genuine concern for preservation of Russian Orthodoxy’s history and culture.

It was also fairly logical that the Russian Orthodox Church, which has long had a mystical connection with power, emerged as this project’s principal executor in the media. Moreover, it was also agreed that the Russian Orthodox Church, unlike the Soviet era, when the church opposed, above all, the crudeness of the authorities towards history itself, should also confront all baleful manifestations of contemporary mass culture, with its concept of diversity and tolerance.

Implementing this thoroughly interesting political project has required considerable quantities of professional lighting and video equipment, air time on national TV channels for hours-long live broadcasts, and numerous background shoots for morally and ethically edifying news stories, where in fact the Patriarch’s well-constructed speeches would be pronounced, helping the faithful make the right political choice during the election campaign, a difficult time for Putin. Moreover, all shooting has to take place continuously; the necessary images must sink into the memory and be constantly updated, to create the impression of something natural, constant and compulsory.

Our sudden musical appearance in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior with the song “Mother of God, Drive Putin Out” violated the integrity of this media image, generated and maintained by the authorities for so long, and revealed its falsity. In our performance we dared, without the Patriarch’s blessing, to combine the visual image of Orthodox culture and protest culture, suggesting to smart people that Orthodox culture belongs not only to the Russian Orthodox Church, the Patriarch and Putin, that it might also take the side of civic rebellion and protest in Russia.

Perhaps such an unpleasant large-scale effect from our media intrusion into the cathedral was a surprise to the authorities themselves. First they tried to present our performance as the prank of heartless militant atheists. But they made a huge blunder, since by this time we were already known as an anti-Putin feminist punk band that carried out their media raids on the country’s major political symbols.

In the end, considering all the irreversible political and symbolic losses caused by our innocent creativity, the authorities decided to protect the public from us and our nonconformist thinking. Thus ended our complicated punk adventure in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior.

I now have mixed feelings about this trial. On the one hand, we now expect a guilty verdict. Compared to the judicial machine, we are nobodies, and we have lost. On the other hand, we have won. Now the whole world sees that the criminal case against us has been fabricated. The system cannot conceal the repressive nature of this trial. Once again, Russia looks different in the eyes of the world from the way Putin tries to present it at daily international meetings. All the steps toward a state governed by the rule of law that he promised have obviously not been made. And his statement that the court in our case will be objective and make a fair decision is another deception of the entire country and the international community. That is all. Thank you.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,417 other followers

%d bloggers like this: